<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:20:48 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This article is actually about objects vs. XML as a protocol for a distributed system, about which it makes some good points.<br><br>But it purports to be about J2EE vs messaging middleware. But J2EE and messaging are clearly compatible through the JMS...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:45:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:45:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:45:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>adrian osullivan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Actually, it's a great example of how an application that could be written with a handful of classes and methods could be chopped up over a network with all sorts of complex messaging. ;-)<br><br>However, if you re-read the article and think...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:54:40 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:54:40 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:54:40 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We're all agreed here. My points are simply that coupling messaging with statelessness doesn't always work from an economy point of view. The article linked messaging and stateless.<br><br>Billy]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:57:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:57:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:57:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Billy Newport</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Pro's and Con's of Async</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Async Messaging and statelessness don't have to be linked, but when they aren't one ends up with fairly complex state machines on both sides of the async connection. Even with relatively simple sets of operations each side has to deal with potentially...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:28:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:28:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:28:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Harris</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I don't think so, it's a thin layer of ice here. Yes, in theory he's right but such systems are typically not economical to scale. A stateless design must keep its state somewhere else and that state needs to be fetched each time a message is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:54:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:54:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:54:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maarten Hazewinkel</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I don't think so, it's a thin layer of ice here. Yes, in theory he's right but such systems are typically not economical to scale. A stateless design must keep its state somewhere else and that state needs to be fetched each time a message is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:40:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:40:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:40:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Billy Newport</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree with all of Eric's points, many of which are inherent to (async) SOAP.  One benefit of messaging he missed is tolerance of an unreliable network, including offline operation.  Eric's points and mine are very well satisfied by JXTA and more or...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:14:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:14:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:14:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 26, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Messaging is the Right Way to Build a Distributed System</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35483</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A message-based design is fundamentally the right way to think about building a distributed system, as opposed to code sharing, remote procedure calls, and the like. Eric Armstrong  explains why.<br><br>Read <a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 26, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Floyd Marinescu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

