<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - JPOX 1.1.0 (JDO2 Reference Implementation) released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:18:20 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Class discriminators: unique IDs or fully qualified class names?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Hibernate does not require any particular visibility of fields, nor getter or setter methods.</blockquote></blockquote>Cool, the remaining 'extras' weren't just Hibernate specific 'extras' but stuff that both engines benefit...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 19:35:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 19:35:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 19:35:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Golfman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>In proxy based ORMs you can't test for null if it's 0-1 lazy</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>So which case would cause the problem with null semantics as discussed and is solved by Hibernate implicitly turning off lazy loading?</blockquote>The case I've described twice now, </blockquote>Ok so you're confirming that there...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:50:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:50:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:50:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Golfman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>In proxy based ORMs you can't test for null if it's 0-1 lazy</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So which case would cause the problem with null semantics as discussed and is solved by Hibernate implicitly turning off lazy loading? I just want to avoid it or possibly get the tool to perform a design critique and suggest to the user that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>In proxy based ORMs you can't test for null if it's 0-1 lazy</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I think what you're saying is that &quot;lazy 0-1 associations don't work in Hibernate unless you turn on byte code enhancement&quot;. </blockquote>That is incorrect and clearly not what I said. There is no other solution for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:51:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:51:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:51:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Golfman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>In proxy based ORMs you can't test for null if it's 0-1 lazy</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think what you're saying is that &quot;lazy 0-1 associations don't work in Hibernate unless you turn on byte code enhancement&quot;. </blockquote><br>That is incorrect and clearly not what I said.<br><br>There is no other solution for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:32:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:32:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:32:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not SQL?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It is possible to transform SQL or JDOQL query string to the same &quot;native&quot; SQL query string. There are many free SQL parser, driver adapter implementations and there are no technical problems to transform query strings, but it looks...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:31:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:31:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:31:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>In proxy based ORMs you can't test for null if it's 0-1 lazy</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Of course proxies work for zero-to-one associations. What Emmanuel wanted to say is that ... [techno bable deleted]</blockquote>For me, a feature either works without issues and workarounds or it doesn't. The negative airplay that many...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:23:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:23:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:23:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Golfman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not SQL?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It is possible to transform SQL or JDOQL query string to the same &quot;native&quot; SQL query string. There are many free SQL parser, driver adapter implementations and there are no technical problems to transform query strings, but it looks like nobody...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 08:59:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 08:59:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 08:59:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>In proxy based ORMs you can't test for null if it's 0-1 lazy</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Of course proxies work for zero-to-one associations. What Emmanuel wanted to say is that they don't work for zero-to-one associations that are mapped with a shared primary key strategy. In that (quite rare) case Hibernate needs an additional query (or a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:32:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:32:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:32:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Some thoughts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>1/ As for performance, the remark on Hibernate being slow is justified (cf <a href="http://www.jpox.org/docs/performance.html" target="_blank">http://www.jpox.org/docs/performance.html</a> - would be interesting to see how JPOX final...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:06:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:06:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:06:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>In proxy based ORMs you can't test for null if it's 0-1 lazy</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So let's me rephrase the whole thing when you have a lazy 0-1 association:&amp;nbsp;- on a proxy based solution a 0-1 association will be eagerly loaded when the first object is rendered (we disable the lazy loading in this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 23:39:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 23:39:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 23:39:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Golfman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>You can test for null if it's not lazy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>&quot;You can test for null <b>if</b> it's not lazy.&quot; was what someone on the Hibernate team, called Emmanuel (same name might just be a coincidence), said in the Hibernate forum.</blockquote><br>I am this Emmanuel and I must admit this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:47:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:47:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:47:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Emmanuel Bernard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>You can test for null if it's not lazy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Given that 99% of the time when I test for the existence of an object that can optionally hang off another object I'm about to do something with that very object (if it exists) so I need it loaded anyway - where's the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:08:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:08:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:08:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>You can test for null if it's not lazy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Dude, do not half cut you message. I stand on my position, you're wrong:<blockquote>In a popular ORM that uses proxy based lazy loading mechanism see what happens when you create a to 0..1 relationship (ie., an optional reference: a reference...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 18:24:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 18:24:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 18:24:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Golfman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JPA</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40266</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The future of JPA lies in the API features it adopts. (or... not)<br>If it embraces the cool features of all persistence FWs, and learns from the mistakes of EJBs (that includes v3 I'm afraid) it'll live.<br>&nbsp;<br>If not, I'm afraid it'll continue to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 09:11:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 09:11:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 09:11:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Wolf Benz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

