<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Terracotta DSO: Open Sourced</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:27:34 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>The forum is broken</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm trying to post to the terracotta forum but I'm always greeted by the following:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:09:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:09:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:09:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stefan Arentz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DSO is the shit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[While Don's post is 100% accurate, I feel it necessary to add (I always do, huh?), that most people using DSO do not end up having to do multi-threaded programming....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:02:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:02:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:02:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ARI ZILKA</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DSO is the shit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi Don,<br><br>The exciting aspect of the DSO solution is also its most dangerous aspect. Today there are many server applications that have debatable thread safety design and implementation issues  still waiting to be discovered (incident)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:06:43 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:06:43 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:06:43 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Don Ferguson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DSO is the shit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Don,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:24:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:24:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:24:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>wlouth</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DSO is the shit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Let me clarify the point about DSO obviating the need for transactions.  DSO provides transactionality, but doesn't do it through JTA.  The transaction boundaries are implied by synchronization on shared objects, not on explicit creation of a transaction...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:13:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:13:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:13:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Don Ferguson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DSO is the shit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hello William,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:09:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:09:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:09:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Don Ferguson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Offline mode support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I would venture a guess that Terracotta would be a good start to easily build "offline" mode support into Java rich clients.  I believe someone mentioned the future development of wide area async support.  This coupled with a protocol that could tunnel...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:32:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:32:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:32:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Anodos Faeryblood</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Fanboys, shame on you</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I have to agree with Hani, I'm not sure this is <i>just</i> a marketing gimmick but it does smell a little that way. It is true that if this was selling they would have upset a lot of clients by open sourcing it but as many of us know...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 04:40:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 04:35:33 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 04:40:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kirk Pepperdine</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Fanboys, shame on you</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I have to agree with Hani, I'm not sure this is <i>just</i> a marketing gimmick but it does smell a little that way. It is true that if this was selling they would have upset a lot of clients by open sourcing it but as many of us know...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:21:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:21:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:21:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ARI ZILKA</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How the server to be clustered</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Terracotta servers can be deployed as an active-Primary plus a passive-Secondary (i.e. 1 or numerous hot-standby(s)) - the hot-standby shares disk with the primary Terracotta Server. On failure of the primary, client-JVMs transparently...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:38:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:38:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:38:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kunal Bhasin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Terracotta DSO: Open Sourced</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi Geir.<br><br>We wanted a license that was as close to possible as "MPL + attribution."  As you may know, the OSI hasn't yet evaluated any of the "MPL + attribution" - style licenses that are gaining in popularity (for example, Zimbra,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:00:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:00:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:00:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Geir Magnusson Jr</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DSO is the shit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Don,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:55:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:55:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:55:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 6, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>wlouth</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Great</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[More competition, more options and more open source. This is great. Specially when serious companies release production ready products as open source. This is what makes the business community adopt open source....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:54:33 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:54:33 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:54:33 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 6, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Casal</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>DSO is the shit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[All this speculation about whether it was a wise or a desperate move on Terracotta's part to open source DSO rather misses the point.  DSO is revolutionary.  ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:59:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:59:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:59:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 6, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Don Ferguson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Hani</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43313</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In the case of Spring with its current focus and high quality there is probably not much of a need or incentive to offer an alternative runtime implementation though it would have been nicer and much more agreeable to have at least attempted to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:03:24 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:03:24 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:03:24 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 6, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>wlouth</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

