<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - WebLogic Server 10 Passes Java EE 5 CTS</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:19:23 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Great!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>.... We're not there yet, but it's getting close. Jboss AS 5 beta 1, Tomcat 6.09beta and now WebLogic 10 TP (of course, Glassfish doesn't count since the public opinion is to avoid using Sun software except for the JDK, right?)</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:01:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:01:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:01:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 28, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>eduardo pelegri-llopart</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>re: Reference Implementation ...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Actually, a Reference Implementation is just a legal term within the JCP process.  Any spec that goes final includes a Specification, a TCK, and an RI.  The TCK is a test suite for the spec; the RI is an implemetnation of the spec (that passes the TCK)....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:56:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:56:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:56:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 28, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>eduardo pelegri-llopart</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Great!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Why don't you give a try to glassfish? Forget about the past, download it and give feedback to us on what is wrong with glassfish....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:20:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:20:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:20:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 14, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Peter Fabian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: WebLogic Server 10</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>do i need to go to weblogic 9 to be on 10 &gt; or can i jump from wl-8 to wl-10.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 14, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Patrick Linskey</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: WebLogic Server 10</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Now that most of the arguments about ORM soultion is over , lets talk about weblogic 10 :)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:17:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:17:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:17:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 14, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>shawn spencer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Cameron,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:58:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:58:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:58:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Perf</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The point is that the only benchmark that matters is *your* unbiased benchmarks of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:45:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:45:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:45:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>As a result of this thread, I received some follow-up information from another "interested party" (i.e. having potential bias) that indicated that the tests they were doing (including Hibernate, OpenJPA née KODO, TopLink) showed that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:49:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:49:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:49:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gavin King</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Perf</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Gavin,<br><br>Would it be possible to provide some more information about the measurements you did? Specifically:<br><br>1. What versions of Kodo and Hibernate was used?<br>2. What hardware/JVM/OS/db was used?<br>3. Was it ensured that no...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:44:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:44:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:44:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gavin King</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Gavin -...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:26:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:26:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:26:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>OC4J is good indeed!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Gustavo, the good news I take from your post is happiness with TopLink - both the reference implementation that Oracle provided as part of Glassfish and, in case you did not know, also ships with OC4J 10.1.3.1 (presumably why you are seeing...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:44:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:44:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:44:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 12, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gustavo Sobral</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Perf</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Gavin,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:19:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:19:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:19:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 12, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Arunabh Hazarika</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: TopLink</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>On the contrary, it usually means it's not a production ready product.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:22:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:22:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:22:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 12, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jason Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>OC4J continued</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, I did set myself up for this so here goes a response as some issues I believe are resolved in the current release (you mention this as well) and others may be issues in how the product was used ... I hope this does not hijack the thread too much...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:26:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:26:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:26:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 12, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Lehmann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Great!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44219</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>We're not there yet, but it's getting close. Jboss AS 5 beta 1, Tomcat 6.09beta and now WebLogic 10 TP (of course, Glassfish doesn't count since the public opinion is to avoid using Sun software except for the JDK,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:40:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:40:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:40:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 12, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>augustientje bloem</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

