<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:49:06 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: oh no!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Cameron,

Hehe, I get that a lot these days. But it definitely is a whole lot 'lighter' on this side though ;-)

Congrats on the Oracle deal though.

Regards,

-krish]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:41:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:41:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:41:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 3, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Krishnan Subramanian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>oh no!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And my point was that Java isn't there (yet?). ..</blockquote>

Krish, you've gone to the dark side ;-)

Peace,

Cameron Purdy
<a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/coherence/index.html">Oracle Coherence: The Java Data Grid</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:05:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:05:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:05:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Jim,<br><br>Parallelizing code is always hard to do programatically and is harder to get right - given the advances in multi-core technology.<br><br>For example, assume you apply predicates on a set of [in-memory] data (e.g. a cache be it...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:01:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:01:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:01:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Jim,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:06:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:06:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:06:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Krishnan Subramanian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For example, this is direction Microsoft has taken with its Language Integrated Query (LINQ) in the upcoming version of .NET (C# 3.0). By moving the abstraction level another step up, and letting developers specify their "intent" leaves the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:45:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:45:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:45:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>There are systems that need distributed (or, more likelly, partitioned) caches, but it will take along time before it becomes the "mainstream" solution.</blockquote><br><br>I didn't try to make any prediction, only said that the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:36:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:36:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:36:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>John Brand</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yes, PLINQ is one of the projects that is an implementation of how to parallelize execution of "intent"....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:39:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:39:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:39:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Krishnan Subramanian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For example, its hard for a JIT infrastructure to take bytecode that consists of for-loops, jumps, conditional statements, creation of temporary data structures (e.g. maps, dictionaries, lists, arrays etc) and apply parallelization techniques...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:11:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:11:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:11:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dilip Ranganathan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I didn't try to make any prediction, only said that the centralized database won't be the best solution for those contexts. Actually I don't think it's even _now_ the best solution, but a legacy.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:10:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:10:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:10:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tracy Nelson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>i disagree completely</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[many core is the new technology.. many node has been around for 30 or 40 years..  since we have seemingly reached the limit of moore's law the trend is to put multiple cores on one chip and share memory.. the challenge is to increase computing  power...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:29:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:29:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:29:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stephen Hyland</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, I don't think Java is even ready for the "many-core era" as the author puts it....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:46:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:46:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:46:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Krishnan Subramanian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There are systems that need distributed (or, more likelly, partitioned) caches, but it will take along time before it becomes the "mainstream" solution.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:56:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:56:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:56:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Fabrizio Giudici</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, I think that in most cases there are some things that must change at the same time as the new "many core-node" scenario. As you pointed out non-distributable resources as the filesystem can't be used, but also a central database won't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:09:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:09:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:09:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>John Brand</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, I think that in most cases there are some things that must change at the same time as the new "many core-node" scenario. As you pointed out non-distributable resources as the filesystem can't be used, but also a central database won't be the best...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:52:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:52:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:52:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Fabrizio Giudici</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java's been ready for many-core era; how about you?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47085</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Patrick Logan posted a blog entry entitled "<a href="http://patricklogan.blogspot.com/2007/09/many-node-has-many-more-implications.html">Many-Node has many more implications than Many-Core</a>," saying that the many-core discussions miss a crucial point:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:36:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:36:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:36:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>14</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

