Support Forums: Message List - Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleDB http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:02:50 -0400 First of all http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 First of all, what period of time are you using to calculate your percentage or uptime? Over a year? For a year 3 nines is less than 6 hours downtime. They were down for a third of that in a single day. In fact, the SLA for S3 specifies that...]]> Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:30:44 -0500 Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:30:44 -0500 Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:30:44 -0500 Jan 31, 2011 Sarah Paul 0 Source code is now available http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 http://code.google.com/p/simplejpa/]]> Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:43:51 -0400 Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:43:51 -0400 Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:43:51 -0400 Mar 11, 2008 Travis Reeder 0 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleDB http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:13:11 -0500 Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:13:11 -0500 Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:13:11 -0500 Mar 6, 2008 George De La Torre 0 Re: Nice job! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 It's great to see someone from the Java community take initiative and design something from scratch like this that could be potentially useful to a lot of folks. I will definitely be checking it out....]]> Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:13:34 -0500 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:13:34 -0500 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:13:34 -0500 Mar 4, 2008 ARI ZILKA 0 more http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:32:28 -0500 Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:32:28 -0500 Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:32:28 -0500 Mar 2, 2008 matlabtutorials matlab 0 Nice job! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:43:08 -0500 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:43:08 -0500 Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:43:08 -0500 Feb 28, 2008 Peter Mularien 1 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 If I'm not mistaken, your continuous integration solution is not mission critical and a 3 hour outage should be mainly an inconvenience....]]> Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:20:05 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:20:05 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:20:05 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 Dmitriy Setrakyan 0 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 What I meant to say is that there are by far more use cases for EC2 where 3 nines ratio for uptime are way more than enough....]]> Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:16:43 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:16:43 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:16:43 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 James Watson 1 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 I get the sarcasm :)

What I meant to say is that there are by far more use cases for EC2 where 3 nines ratio for uptime are way more than enough.

(Let me know how that haircut goes)

Best,
Dmitriy Setrakyan
 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:09:19 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:09:19 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:09:19 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:54:55 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:54:55 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:54:55 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 Dmitriy Setrakyan 4 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542
That's fine if 3 nines is good enough. For a lot of systems it is not. 3 nines and 'no worries about uptime' are not the same thing at all.
But for a lot of systems it is ;-)

For example, we at Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:59 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:59 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:59 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 James Watson 5 Source Code? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:44 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:44 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:44 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 Ted Slusser 1 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 That's fine if 3 nines is good enough. For a lot of systems it is not. 3 nines and 'no worries about uptime' are not the same thing at all.But for a lot of systems it is ;-)...]]> Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:28:33 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:28:33 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:28:33 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 Dmitriy Setrakyan 6 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 My point is that if you agree to their terms, then by definition, it means there are "no worries" otherwise you wouldn't have opted to use their services in the first place (unless you're insane). There actually are sites where 3 nines is...]]> Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:23:28 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:23:28 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:23:28 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: Java Persistence API (JPA) implementation for Amazon SimpleD http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48542 I really didn't want to get involved in this flame discussion,...]]> Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:06:43 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:06:43 -0500 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:06:43 -0500 Feb 27, 2008 James Watson 0