<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Article: BDoc - Supporting Behavior-Driven Development</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:19:42 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New name for old cattle?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=51280</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thanks to you and others for feedback!...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:49:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:49:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:49:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Per Otto Christensen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Specification, not verification</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=51280</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I've made a lot of compromises to support my main requirement for BDoc: Support existing ways of writing tests, while still getting a new valuable view of the code, readable be people inside and outside the development team. So you might call it support...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:36:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:36:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:36:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Per Otto Christensen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: B******* Driven Development</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=51280</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The UI is the only thing a lot of peers involved in the definition process will be able to conceive and understand.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:53:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:53:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:53:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Per Otto Christensen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>New name for old cattle?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=51280</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Honestly I don't think so. At a first glance I thought the same but I think you're not only prototyping here, you're also describing requirements at a test level. Not sure how does that work in production, but the idea is great. Requirement Document...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:35:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:35:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:35:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lucas de Oliveira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Specification, not verification</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=51280</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm not sure if the presented framework fully supports the core ideas behind BDD....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:25:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:25:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:25:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Gleichmann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>B******* Driven Development</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=51280</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Now really, if one comes along and renames Rapid Prototyping to "Behavior Driven Development" by adding a number of acronyms and buzzword (injections, ensureThat ...), where Code is basically coded only and when it is needed to satisfy a requirement of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:45:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:45:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:45:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Karl Banke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Article: BDoc - Supporting Behavior-Driven Development</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=51280</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Behavior driven development (BDD) is getting more and more attention, and a lot of frameworks are out there to support it. But something is missing in the Java World – a BDD-framework that supports existing ways of writing tests, so that developers...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:56:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:20:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:56:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nuno Teixeira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

