<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Maybe we don't need objects to build client side apps?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:34:24 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maybe we don't need objects to build client side apps?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I guess with all this JavaScript and custom new scripting languages running desktop apps that maybe we don't need a real object oriented programming language on the client side?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:28:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:28:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:28:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>R. R.</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maybe we don't need objects to build client side apps?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Frank, I fully understand your concerns, IMHO JavaScript is weak and when the number of lines increase it becomes a nightmare to manage....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:10:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:10:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:10:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maybe we don't need objects to build client side apps?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[i hope that in this forum the question of whether to use objects or not is a rhetorical one ;)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:26:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:26:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:26:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 19, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Onn Ben-Zvi</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Desktop development at all?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I just wish that the fat client could have been written in Java so I wouldn't have to maintain code in two domains of knowledge.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:03:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:03:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:03:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Titanium</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hey Frank,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:37:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:37:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:37:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jhaynie</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Desktop development at all?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Good comments James. I'm having a similar experience. My open source test project delivers a SWING-based Java desktop. It's basically a fat client to a set of Web services that actually run the test. For a while I've been getting requests for an Eclipse...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:26:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:26:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:26:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>fcohen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Even on the intranet?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The move to rich browser-based clients on the Internet is understandable, but do people think we are going to move away (or have already moved away) from rich Java-based clients on the Intranet?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:00:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:00:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:00:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Even on the intranet?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The move to rich browser-based clients on the Internet is understandable, but do people think we are going to move away (or have already moved away) from rich Java-based clients on the Intranet?

Interested in your thoughts?

Cheers,
Ashley.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:25:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:25:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:25:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ashley Aitken</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Do not mix OO with language</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree with Ingo, js can be written fully OO (and you can write fully non OO java ! )....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:38:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:38:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:38:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>christophe blin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Objects are not the issue</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Javascript can be written fully Object orientated. It also provides closures, which Java wants but can't decide on how....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:30:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:30:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:30:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ingo Boegemann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Maybe we don't need objects to build client side apps?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54595</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Adobe announced last month that it had achieved 100 million installations of AIR. Appcelerator received $4 Million dollars in venture funding last year to deliver an open source alternative to AIR named Titanium. Sun - excuse me Oracle - spent the better...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:27:08 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:27:08 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:27:08 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 14, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>fcohen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

